Linguistics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Linguistics, including details on human language, phonetics, syntax, phonology. | ||||||||
|
Effect of age, presentation method, and learning on identification of noise-vocoded words.Sheldon S, Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada. Noise vocoding was used to investigate the ability of younger and older adults with normal audiometric thresholds in the speech range to use amplitude envelope cues to identify words. In Experiment 1, four 50-word lists were tested, with each word presented initially with one frequency band and the number of bands being incremented until it was correctly identified by the listener. Both age groups required an average of 5.25 bands for 50% correct word identification and performance improved across the four lists. In Experiment 2, the same participants who completed Experiment 1 identified words in four blocked noise-vocoded conditions (16, 8, 4, 2 bands). Compared to Experiment 1, both age groups required more bands to reach the 50% correct word identification threshold in Experiment 2, 6.13, and 8.55 bands, respectively, with younger adults outperforming older adults. Experiment 3 was identical to Experiment 2 except the participants had no prior experience with noise-vocoded speech. Again, younger adults outperformed older adults, with thresholds of 6.67 and 8.97 bands, respectively. The finding of age effects in Experiments 2 and 3, but not in Experiment 1, seems more likely to be related to differences in the presentation methods than to experience with noise vocoding. Published 7 January 2008 in J Acoust Soc Am, 123(1): 476-88.
© 2005-2008 Linguistics Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||